If you put your hands on this oar with me,
they will never harm another, and they will come to find
they hold everything you want.
If you put your hands on this oar with me, they would no longer
lift anything to your
mouth that might wound your precious land
that sacred earth that is your body.
If you put your soul against this oar with me,
the power that made the universe will enter your sinew
from a source not outside your limbs, but from a holy realm
that lives in us.
Exuberant is existence, time a husk.
When the moment cracks open, ecstasy leaps out and devours space;
love goes mad with the blessings, like my words give.
Why lay yourself on the torturer's rack of the past and the future?
The mind that tries to shape tomorrow beyond its capacities
will find no rest.
Be kind to yourself, dear to our innocent follies.
Forget any sounds or touch you knew that did not help you dance.
You will come to see that all evolves us.
~ Rumi ~
Know thyself. It
wasn't so highfalutin', those words carved in stone in Delphi. More
of a warning to keep to your place. The beautiful and the good
were the rich. It's always been the philosopher's looking back and
forward that changed the meaning, and thus, the possibilities.
*****
***
*
entrees:
thirst
What
did you think?
the world
is the theater
of the periodic revolution of soul
the
modern Socrates
orts and
slarts:
Morning, from my side door
What images return O my
daughter.
ą la
carte:
Rossetti's prose
PAN
dhlawrence
LINKS
The Struggle for
America's Soul has Just Begun
home

We,
each and all of us, contain within us the entire history of the
world, and just as our body records Man's genealogy as far back as
the fish and then some, so our soul encompasses everything that has
ever existed in human souls. All gods and devils that have ever
existed are within us as possibilities, desires, as solutions.
~Hermann Hesse, 'Reflections'
*****
***
*
~every man is more than just himself; he also
represents the unique, the very special and always significant and
remarkable point at which the world's phenomena intersect, only
once in this way and never again. *That is why every man's story
is important, eternal, sacred; that is why every man, as long as
he lives and fulfills the will of nature, is wondrous, and worthy
of every consideration. In each individual the spirit has become
flesh, in each man the creation suffers, within each one a
redeemer is nailed to the cross. ~Hermann Hesse
|
| SEAN What did you think?
WILL What did
I think?
A beat. Will has
obviously been stewing on this.
WILL (cont'd) Say
I'm working at N.S.A. Somebody puts a code on my desk,
something nobody else can break. So I take a shot at it and
maybe I break it. And I'm real happy with myself, 'cause I did
my job well. But maybe that code was the location of some
rebel army in North Africa or the Middle East. Once they have
that location, they bomb the village where the rebels were
hiding and fifteen hundred people I never had a problem with
get killed. (rapid fire) Now the politicians are sayin' "send
in the Marines to secure the area" 'cause they don't give a
shit. It won't be their kid over there, gettin' shot. Just
like it wasn't them when their number got called, 'cause they
were pullin' a tour in the National Guard. It'll be some guy
from Southie takin' shrapnel in the ass. And he comes home to
find that the plant he used to work at got exported to the
country he just got back from. And the guy who put the
shrapnel in his ass got his old job, 'cause he'll work for
fifteen cents a day and no bathroom breaks. Meanwhile my buddy
from Southie realizes the only reason he was over there was so
we could install a government that would sell us oil at a good
price. And of course the oil companies used the skirmish to
scare up oil prices so they could turn a quick buck. A cute,
little ancillary benefit for them but it ain't helping my
buddy at two-fifty a gallon. And naturally they're takin'
their sweet time bringin' the oil back and maybe even took the
liberty of hiring an alcoholic skipper who likes to drink
seven and sevens and play slalom with the icebergs and it
ain't too long 'til he hits one, spills the oil, and kills all
the sea-life in the North Atlantic. So my buddy's out of work
and he can't afford to drive so he's got to walk to the job
interviews which sucks 'cause the shrapnel in his ass is
givin' him chronic hemorrhoids. And meanwhile he's starvin'
'cause every time he tries to get a bite to eat the only
blue-plate special they're servin' is North Atlantic scrod
with Quaker State.
A beat.
WILL (cont'd) So
what'd I think? I'm holdin' out for somethin' better. I figure
I'll eliminate the middle man. Why not just shoot my buddy,
take his job and give it to his sworn enemy, hike up gas
prices, bomb a village, club a baby seal, hit the hash pipe
and join the National Guard? Christ, I could be elected
President.
SEAN Do you think
you're alone?
WILL
What?
SEAN Do you have a
soul-mate?
WILL Define
that.
SEAN Someone who
challenges you in every way. Who takes you places, opens
things up for you. A soul-mate.
WILL
Yeah.
Sean
waits.
WILL (cont'd)
Shakespeare, Nietzsche, Frost, O'Connor, Chaucer, Pope,
Kant—
SEAN They're all
dead.
WILL Not to me,
they're not.
~Matt
Damon and Ben Affleck from Good Will
Hunting
|
(my best
friend nora barrington, me (top), undergrads)
bound with
withies
Sent: 3 May 2003
It's been interesting, these five years in the
Midwest, giving me an angle to see things. Except for missing those
of you I've been lucky to know, I won't be sad for a moment to go.
Yet I know for a fact that you can never really leave.
Just after college, I moved from Washington, DC to an
alternative community in Maine where we tried to free ourselves from
the corporate controlled world, the media, the oil. One
morning I sat on the steps of the geodesic dome I lived in, hand
grinding my co-op coffee, thinking that since I was 8 hrs up the
coast of Maine in one of the poorest counties in the nation, I was
living a real alternative—that I could be Thoreau, Franklin,
Blake, and all my rabble-rousing heroes. There, out on the craggy
rocks where the light first hits the USA, we were ex-teachers,
ex-accountants, ex-grad students, and artists, people interested in
developing and living with alternatives; people who saw the great
waste generated by modern life as simply misplaced resources that
needed to be recycled. We wrote Vista grants, redid the local
library, taught in the schools, and the people who stayed on there
winter after bitter winter really have made life better for everyone
in that threadbare land.
Happily grinding away, I sat in the sunshine, yoga
breathing pure nature, delighted that the black flies had gone for
the year. And then I heard something... it came through the woods
from beyond where you can see: the sound of a marching band playing
Stars and Stripes Forever. I sat up, squinting. What could
this be? I thought I was surrounded by wildlife, bears and endless
trees. But it turned out that it was the local high school
marching band gearing up for the 4th of July, just kids who watched
network TV and wanted cars and McD's hamburgers and tapes of songs
they heard on the radio: the old McLife. There was a bus that pulled up once
a week at the one small diner at the crossroads they called town,
and the destination on the flap above the driver's head said New
York. Many of them would end up on it—and the ones who stayed
behind sought to import as much of New York there as they could.
Slowly I learned that even in alt.communities there
were people at the co-op who felt more equal than others, people who
came from money (Connecticut, mind you) who thought they should work
less than others because they were more used to leisure and
therefore work was harder on them. People who hated churches yet
looked down on those who didn't attend the weekly Sufi dancing...
people who looked at you with disgust if you didn't roll your own
tortillas.
One morning, I found myself sitting with the ladies of
the women's group, all of us in long imported Indian dresses,
scarves around our heads, and I watched them nurse their lovely
babies. Each and every baby had an Indian print kerchief around its
little head. Now I'm all for old Mr. Gandhi, but I doubt the people
of India saw much return for the labor in our cotton dresses. Nor
did I feel comfortable as one mother blushed, feeling failed, as she
told us that her baby's earache wasn't responding to the herbal
concoction that worked for everyone else. She knew she was doomed to
fail, and had been so ever since having a c-section. I commiserated
with her in silence. I, too, was feeling doomed and failed, without
even a c-section—because I had morning sickness. What was wrong
with me? Moreover—I was feeling guilty for smuggling an
occasional coke in from the local bait store (it settled my
stomach), for I knew I would be shunt if that even got out—just as
sure as the Sunfall family had forever fallen from grace when they
were seen in Bangor at the Dairy Queen.
Seems there's always someone around to call you a
hypocrite. Rush didn't start that, much as he likes to think he
did.
Slowly, and then more quickly, it dawned on me that
you can't escape human nature. The Franklins and Thoreaus and Thomas
Hardys and DHLawrences are always few and far between, and they have
their bad days too. I realized that no matter where you live on
earth—even off in the midst of sandstorms—that it's just a matter of
time before there's a McDonald's down the road from you.
So what am I left with, idealism exhausted, aware of
knowing nothing? Nothing
grand. Just simple things: to try keep from becoming these machines
we serve, to establish and maintain individuality while still
contributing and belonging to the community. Hard one, that last,
for me. I know nothing, but still I sense that where we've gone
really, really wrong is in thinking we are masters of Nature rather
than part of it... forgetting that symbiosis is, after all, the
principle of what endures. All that theory simplified in a
Beautiful Mind is much more a true and better model than the
social Darwinism that has hung us over the last two centuries.
But whatever happens, we'll get over it. Because we
aren't masters, and all the little tin gods who are now making such
misery—all the blowhard liars of FOX news and hate radio—all the
baseball caps in pick-up trucks and monster SUV's—they will all
simply dry up and blow away like everything else. They can dismantle
the Federal government, Constitution, Bill of Rights, write books,
make wars and leftbehinder movies, project Jesus in the sky—but
that's all it will be: their own projection.
We will all be replaced... and above all I thank the
gods that children will rebel. Enough of them will always tend to
sweep the hands off their shoulders, like those nursing babies with
those Indian kerchiefs, and some will manage to do some good. I've
tried to enable my own rabble rousers, and have been happy to mostly
stand back and share their unfolding, giving them the mental,
spiritual, and physical space to do that safely—to the best of my
ability. But lastly, I am in accord with the below... and I leave it
with you today with a great joy that all of you have lived in the
world at this time. I salute the light in you and know it
illuminates others in this darkness.
With heart, Deborah
Jung wrote a letter on 9/14/1960,
nine months before his death. There's little doubt he was
speaking to us all.
Excerpt:
[...] my main tenet contains nothing more than:
Follow that will and that way which experience confirms to be your
own, i.e., the true expression of your individuality. [...] None
believes in the blossoming and unfolding of the individual as the
experimental, doubtful, and bewildering work of the living God, to
whom we have to lend our eyes and ears and our discriminating
mind, to which end they have been incubated upon for millions of
years and brought to light since about 6,000 years ago, viz. at
the moment when the historical continuity of consciousness became
visible through the invention of script.
We are sorely in need of a Truth or a self-understanding similar to that of Ancient Egypt, which I have
found still living with the Taos Pueblos. Their chief of
ceremonies old Ochwiay Biano (Mountain Lake) said to me : 'We are
the people who live on the roof of the world, we are the sons of
the Sun, who is our father. We help him daily to rise and to cross
the sky. We do not do this for ourselves, but for the Americas
also. Therefore they should not interfere with our religion. But
if they continue to do so (by missionaries) and hinder us, then
they will see in ten years the sun will rise no more.' He
correctly assumes that their day, their light, their consciousness
and their meaning will die, when destroyed through the
narrow-mindedness of American Rationalism, and the same will
happen to the whole world, when subjected to such treatment. That
is the reason I tried to find the best truth and the clearest
light I could attain to, and since I have reached my highest point
and can't transcend any more, I am guarding my light and my
treasure, convinced that nobody would gain and I myself would be
badly, even hopelessly injured, if I should lose it. It is the
most precious not only to me, but above all to the darkness of the
creator, who needs man to illuminate his creation. If God had
foreseen his world, it would be a mere senseless machine and Man's
existence a useless freak. My intellect can envisage the latter
possibility, but the whole of my being says 'No' to it...
*****
***
*
“In that hour,
weary of life, men will no longer regard the world as the worthy
object of their admiration and
reverence."
~
on the inevitable end of
Egyptian religion, Hermes Trismegistus to
his disciple, Asclepius
June 12, 2003
During the continuing PR
blitz, in fact, ever since the Reagan years, those who opposed Viet
Nam have been painted as fools who are now ashamed of their counter
position. This is a distortion. A lie, in fact.
I remember those times, the
way a little girl came climbing in my lap (when such things were
allowed) in an art center in Maryland, with her peace belt buckle
and fancy flared tie-dyed jeans. "You're a groovy hippy," she says.
Am I? I’d thought I was incognito—counter culture, true, but not
street-person hippy. That night, I opened the Washington Post and
there was an ad for No-Makeup Makeup; many ads for long dresses with
small bells like the ones I always wore, dresses mostly made of
India print fabric. And there were hand-embroidered work shirts for
some high price that were given a half-a-page tout, courtesy of Saks
Fifth Avenue. Goodness. Here they were for sale, the trappings of
the counter culture, blue jeans and work shirts deluxe. We had worn
them as William Morris wore his good Socialist smock. The dress was
an expression of humility and equality. It was class-free, nothing
like this display of feathers worn at the expense of someone else's
labor for low pay.
Know thyself. It wasn't so highfalutin', those
words carved in stone in Delphi. More
of a warning to keep to your place. The beautiful and the good were
the rich. It's always been the philosopher's looking back and
forward that changed the meaning, and thus, the possibilities.
Watching Manor House on
Public Television last month—an empirical reality-TV version of
Upstairs, Downstairs, and one of the best things they've done—I
observe the 21st century businessman who has been picked to live the
life of Lord High-and-Mighty for 3 months. He's loving every minute,
posing so well he forgets it's a pose. Real tears will be shed as he and
his wife leave such wonder and beauty. There he is, in his
well-stuffed shirt-front, saying of his run-ragged servants, "But
for me, they wouldn't have jobs..." And it hits home, the way the
second part of that thought remains unspoken: "...but for them you'd
have nothing." (Labor, of course, grows on trees and lives on air.) It's more than the burdens of the life the servants
live, unseen because seeing them would spoil the fun. It's
that—admit it—wealth too often has blood on it. Some slavery, some
speculation that paid off beyond the real give-and-take value of
things. But never mind. Lord H&M had words for the Socialists who
came visiting during his garden party. If he took his gold and
spread it pound by pound upon the masses, they'd really be no better
off. What--they'd buy more beer? Therefore -- he should have it.
(Give him moment and he'll tell you it's god's plan. 'E knows 'im,
see;
sits upfront at church in 'is especial family pew...)
Enron was just the tip of an
iceberg, what happened to be seen. Bad luck, old man!
But I remember that little
girl, dressed in the trappings of a revolution that meant nothing at
all to her, no more than a Barbie T-shirt. That was when I
understood the sinister power of manipulation in this throwaway
world, where the market just absorbs, refits, and makes meaningless
symbols by using them to sell something else.
A whole industry, a science, they've made of it,
entering the psyche with a sublimely trained stealth. That sell is
huge now, beyond Napoleonic dreams. And we accept this.
The contemporary West is not - despite our constant
calling of them to memory - built on Auschwitz and Treblinka, to
which we have said 'No'. It is built on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to
which we have said 'Yes'."
Desmond Fennell: The Revision of
European History
That unquestioned acceptance of a Hiroshima, a
Nagasaki... Those were individuals
killed, innocents caught up in a nation gone mad with a collective
militarism. The bomb was dropped to save lives, to shorten and end
the war. But those were civilians killed by it. It's difficult to
reconcile, and it should be. It really should be.
"Where there is no vision the people perish." A
consumer culture where personal worth is judged by the collective
and placed on the material--even a literalist material god--has lost
all vision.
For life plays itself out in the individual:*
But the individual as the only carrier of life and
existence is of paramount importance. He cannot be substituted by
a group or by a mass. Yet we are rapidly approaching a state in
which nobody will accept individual responsibility any more. We
prefer to leave it as an odious business to groups and
organizations, blissfully unconscious of the fact that the group
or mass psyche is that of an animal and wholly inhuman. What we
need is the development of the inner spiritual man, the unique
individual whose treasure is hidden on the one hand in the symbols
of our mythological tradition, and on the other hand in man's
unconscious psyche. CGJUNG
The robotics, genetic engineering, and nanotech chill
me, these things that further distance a balanced response, a chance
of seeing others as human, a sense of having or taking personal
responsibility. Technology is taking us, paradoxically, back to the
tribal.
Our response to Terrorism has been tribal. We make no
progress.
The tribal aspects of Hitler's rise, his breathtaking
grasp of persuasion over a brilliant people, boggles the mind. But
think also of Denmark, the one country that simply refused to hand
over its Jews to him. I can't speak for that country now, but their
stance against Hitler didn't come from organizing, preaching,
marching in the street. It was just individuals who spontaneously
refused to take part in it. They simply didn't cooperate.
In spite of it all, I remain hopeful. We don't bloom
the flowers. In fact, we control very little in this world. For us,
finding our way must be a matter of seeking wholeness, and of
trusting each other, and not fearing ourselves. A matter of being
in accord with nature and the vision born with each individual.
Therefore virtue requires only that we desire it, since it is in
us, and arises from us. For when the soul maintains its intellectual
part according to nature, virtue exists. And [the soul] maintains it
according to nature, whenever it remains as it came into being, and
it came into being beautiful and perfectly straight. ... Being
upright, for the soul, is [to have] its νοέρον ('the intellectual
part') according to its nature, as it was created. ~Greek Vita Antonii 20.5-7 (2x), ed.
G.J.M.Bartelink, Sources chretiennes 400, Paris 1994
This accord according to nature. The Vita
Antonii is now almost 2000 years old, expressing an idea of accord
that was ancient even then.
It's time to go back, pick up the
golden thread, follow it out of the maze, away from kings and tribal
mass-minds that
facilitate monsters.
Getting closer. Thanks for listening.
x's Deborah
The psychological processes, which accompany
the present war, above all the incredible brutalization of
public opinion, the mutual slanderings, the unprecedented fury
of destruction, the monstrous flood of lies, and man's
capacity to call a halt to the bloody demon - are suited like
nothing else to powerfully push in front of the eyes of
thinking men the problem of the restlessly slumbering chaotic
unconscious under the ordered world of consciousness. This war
has pitilessly revealed to civilized man that he is still a
barbarian. . . But the psychology of the individual
corresponds to the psychology of the nation. What the nation
does is done also by each individual, and so long as the
individual does it, the nation also does it. Only the change
in the attitude of the individual is the beginning of the
change in the psychology of the nation. ~CGJUNG (CW7,4, trans,
mod.)
We pass the word around; we ponder how the case is
put by different people, we read the poetry; we meditate over the
literature; we play the music; we change our minds; we reach an
understanding. Society evolves this way, not by shouting each
other down, but by the unique capacity of unique, individual human
beings to comprehend each other. ~Lewis Thomas
Music is the effort we make to explain to ourselves
how our brains work. We listen to Bach transfixed because this is
listening to a human mind. ~Lewis Thomas
The symbols of the circle and the quaternity, the
hallmarks of the individuation process, point back, on the one
hand, to the original and primitive order of human society, and
forward on the other to the inner order of the psyche. It is as
though the psyche were the indispensable instrument in the
reorganization of a civilized community as opposed to the
collectives which are so much in favor today.... CGJUNG The
Psychology of Transference
Re libido:
I don't
mean to be invidious--but Purgation: Is that not a
centerpiece of Freudian theory? A closed system of
forces/energies playing off one another. It always seemed
so mechanical, venting and repressing. What is its
relationship to eternity, to our experience and intuition
of the mystery we came out of -- and go back into?
I don't feel it. Jung seems a living system, the
unconscious a creative matrix, not a receptacle of
repressed content. It is that from which we develop.
Libido as something akin to Eros is a reading
readily compatible with Jung.
Jung writes:
"...the term
"libido," introduced by Freud, is not without a
sexual connotation, an exclusively sexual definition of
this concept is one sided and must therefore be
rejected. Appetite and compulsion are the specific
features of all impulses and automatisms. No more
than sexual metaphors of common speech can the
corresponding analogies in instinctual processes, and the
symptoms and dreams to which they give rise, be taken
literally. *The sexual theory of psychic
automatisms is an untenable prejudice.* [that's their beef, yes?]
The very fact that it is impossible to derive the whole mass from a
single instinct forbids a one-sided definition of libido. I use this
term in the general sense in which it was understood by the classical
authors. [...]
We
can say, then, that the concept of libido in psychology
has functionally the same significance as the concept of
energy in physics since the time of Robert Mayer. (See my "On Psychic
Energy,"**
CW5, SYMBOLS OF TRANSFORMATION
[** in cgj
CW8]
And with
energy, we're back to ambivalence, back to Eros:
the
force that moves the sun and all the stars.
Fascination is a psychopomp, mediator between mortal and
immortal, the conscious and the unconscious. Is its
movement not libido? It says that to me. I
never felt Freud going all the way with this
meaning. The Full Monty that encompasses all
things. Freud pulled back from that. Fell off his chair.
Jung wrote of Freud, and to a great extent it's
applicable to the present:
The historical conditions which preceded Freud were
such that they made a phenomenon like himself necessary, and it is
precisely the fundamental tenet of his teaching-namely, the
repression of sexuality-that is most clearly conditioned in this
historical sense. Like his greater contemporary Nietzsche, Freud
stands at the end of the Victorian era, which was never given such
an appropriate name on the Continent despite the fact that it was
just as characteristic of the Germanic and Protestant countries as
of the Anglo-Saxon. The Victorian era was an age of repression, of a
convulsive attempt to keep anaemic ideals artificially alive in a
framework of bourgeois respectability by constant moralizings.
These ideals were the last offshoots of the collective religious
ideas of the Middle Ages, and shortly before had been severely
shaken by the French Enlightenment and the ensuing revolution. Hand
in hand with this, ancient truths in the political field had become
hollow and threatened to collapse. It was still too soon for the
final overthrow, and consequently all through the nineteenth century
frantic efforts were made to prevent the Christian Middle Ages from
disappearing altogether. Political revolutions were stamped out,
experiments in moral freedom were thwarted by middle-class public
opinion, and the critical philosophy of the late eighteenth century
reached its end in a renewed, systematic attempt to capture the
world in a unified network of thought on the medieval model. But in
the course of the nineteenth century enlightenment slowly broke
through, particularly in the form of scientific materialism and
rationalism.
This is the matrix out of which Freud grew, and its
mental characteristics have shaped him along foreordained lines. He
has a passion for explaining everything rationally, exactly as in
the eighteenth century; one of his favourite maxims is Voltaire's "Ecrasez
l'infame." With a certain satisfaction he invariably points out the
flaw in the crystal; all complex psychic phenomena like art,
philosophy, and religion fall under his suspicion and appear as
"nothing but" repressions of the sexual instinct.
Sigmund Freud in his Historical Setting
CGJUNG CW 15
2 June 2004
Joscelyn Godwin in Harmonies of Heaven and Earth
writes:
The Song of the Angels is their Gnosis; or, to
put it another way, what they know cannot be spoken, only
sung.
This tradition has been continued by two
myth-makers of our own time. In J. R. R. Tolkien's The
Silmarillion, the first chapter is entitle 'The Music of the
Ainur', and it describes how 'Eru, the One, who is called
Iluvatar' declared a mighty theme to the Ainur ('the Holy Ones.
that were the offspring of his thought'). Iluvatar said:
[Of the theme that I have declared to you, I
will now that ye make in harmony together a Great Music. And
since I have kindled you with the Flame Imperishable, ye shall
show forth your powers in adorning this theme, each with his own
thoughts and devices, if he will. But I will sit and hearken,
and be glad that through you great beauty has been awakened into
song.
Then the voices of the Ainur, like unto harps
and lutes, and pipes and trumpets, and viols and orgam, and like
unto countless choirs singing with words, began to fashion the
theme of Iluvatar to a great music; and a sound arose of endless
interchanging melodies woven in harmony that passed beyond
hearing into the depths and into the heights, and the places of
the dwelling of Iluvatar were filled to overflowing, and the
music and the echo of the music went out into the Void, and it
was not void.]
I love Philo's (Philo
of Alexandria 20 BCE-50 CE) dance as he processes the
special nature of the "poetry":
God is an author in whose work you will find no
myth or fiction, but truth's inexorable rules all observed as
though graven on stone. You will find no metres and rhythms and
tuneful verses charming the ear with their music, but nature's
own consummate works, which possess a harmony all their own.
And even as the mind with its ear turned to God's poems,
rejoices, so the word in harmony with the meanings of thought
and in a way approaching it, is necessarily glad. [...]
The Creator says that He knows that the uttered
word, being brother to the mind can speak, for He has made it
like an instrument of sound to be an articulate utterance of
our whole complex being. This Logos, both for me and for you
and for all men, sounds and speaks and announces our thoughts,
and, more than this, goes out to meet that which reason has
thought.
The music analog. What they know cannot be
spoken, only sung.
Music is the effort we make to explain to
ourselves how our brains work. We listen to Bach transfixed
because this is listening to a human mind. ~Lewis Thomas
"Never speak it," the old magicians cautioned. The
Word was ineffable, paradoxical, impossible to be grasped in pure
conscious thought.
The concept of logos in Heraclitus, Philo, the
Platonic, as well as the broad personification of such concepts
reflected in daimon, genius, eidolon... all relate to an awareness
of the origin of consciousness (and, ultimately, the
differentiation and relationship between ego and Self). The early
Greeks who prized oral tradition were followed by those who were
long suspicious of written things, who felt it was the direct
connection to the gods speaking through us that was important.
Like Beauty,
the concern was to mainline the Forms: a direct experience of the
Forms (or Logos as Philo, a mystical Greek Jew, defines it), as
opposed to the written word which could never be better than twice
removed.
It's as if they were too aware that the conscious
mind we define ourselves by had not long been broken off from the
unconscious, an awareness of consciousness so new and so
threatening--exciting, I suppose--that it inspired myths of eating
at the tree of knowledge, woman and her snake... (sadly, the
misogyny floating around at least since Homer).
Consciousness moved individuals to "think from
their own center" as opposed to the reflex of tribal dogma. But to
deny the shadow sublimated within its workings, to hamstring
investigation of it--to not allow mystery-- it's what Jung
is writing about in The Spirit Mercurius
(CW 13). He cautions:
[It seems to me that Augustine apprehended a
great truth, namely that every spiritual truth gradually turns
into something material, becoming no more than a tool in the
hand of man. In consequence man can hardly avoid seeing himself
as a knower, yes, even as a creator, with boundless
possibilities at his command. The alchemist was basically this
sort of person, but much less so than modern man. An alchemist
could still pray: "Purge the horrible darknesses of our mind,"
but modern man is already so darkened that nothing beyond the
light his own intellect illuminates his world. "Occasus Christi,
passio Christi." That surely is why such strange things are
happening to our much lauded civilization, more like a
Gotterddmmerung than any normal twilight.
Mercurius, that two-faced god, comes as the
lumen naturae, the Servator and Salvator, only to those whose
reason strives towards the highest light ever received by man,
and who do not trust exclusively to the cognitio vespertina. For
those who are unmindful of this light, the lumen naturae turns
into a perilous ignis fatnus, and the psychopomp into a
diabolical seducer. Lucifer, who could have brought light,
becomes the father of lies whose voice in our time, supported by
press and radio, revels in orgies of propaganda and leads untold
millions to ruin.]
This last bit we see today in the self-fulfilling
prophecy of the Rapture and Millennialism, a cult's unwavering
conviction that only they know "the natural order", which is to
say, their definition of their God's mind, the Word as only they,
the saved, can hear it.
The Greeks had plenty to say about those who
thought themselves god's equals, able to speak music. So would
Philo.
Piaget described the process of consciousness
evolving out of unconsciousness in the individual. In the same
way, levels of consciousness evolve in humans, both self-awareness
and awareness of the process itself. Like any evolution, the
process can go either way--thus the scary collectives Jung and
Bruno address.
I caught a snip of movie from just after the WW2,
a melodrama in which a boy supposedly watched films of the Nazi
Holocaust. The voice over told him that Hitler was opposed to
Christianity, that he planned to wipe it out. It also said that
'perhaps' the greatest harm was done to the Jewish people.
Perhaps! But the truth was that there were good people of
Christian faith who stood against Hitler. Most did not. Hitler was
himself an Millennialist, as are so many Fundamentalists today. One
only has to look at Tom Delay or John Ashcroft or Ted Olson to see
the hand of the dead on the shoulder of the living, making choices
to that inner voice of the Divine they identify with -- when they're not calling it the devil.
They also seek to rewrite History, which has
always been written by the victor and in no way can truly reflects
its time.
Take Philo. He was spared by Constantine's PR man
Eusebius because he had some utility in forming the Church Canon.
Where are the sources for that tradition he extrapolates? Gone.
Yet too developed to have been only his ... and even yet it goes
on, sublimated into the Kabbalah and magick.
Jung didn't view the unconscious as a cesspool
needing to be purged, pulled up in buckets and dragged to
destruction, but as the dark living ground of all creativity.
Individuation is about centering, working at a stillpoint in
accord with an ineffable nature, "an instrument of sound to be an
articulate utterance of our *whole complex being*." Thus,
Rationality alone, pure Thinking fx, becomes a blinding light, a
sneer too ready--just as pure intuition degrades easily to
superstition.
For all our conscious pure intellectual light, we don't
begin to know much about time or space or matter or where they
begin or end.
http://www.biophysica.com/quantum.htm In science, we build the model, not
the thing. In revealed religion, we project ourselves as Deity.
We get down and wallow in the mud we came out of
(mud made of stars); we dance, we are irrational. We are body, and
our thoughts are more than body. We can map out chemicals and
genes, we follow neurotransmitters and the formation of memories.
We can give pills to wipe memory out of the conscious mind, and we
understand that each time we draw a memory up, we also rewrite it.
But there is no chemistry that accounts for the sudden
understanding of a concept. There are no chemical, electrical
changes in the ah-HA, the momentary leap of the heart.
Symbiosis, balance, accord: we're dying for it.
Humility seems our best partner. "Sit up mud." Our nature is
to live within the Music's Mystery.
Summa felicitas,
Deborah
What is the use of a religion without a mythos,
since religion means, if anything, precisely that function which
links us back to eternal myth? ~CGJUNG
The greatest successes in evolution, the mutants
who have, so to speak, made it, have done so by fitting in with,
and sustaining the rest of life.
~Lewis Thomas
a treasure from my oldest daughter, mother's day
Today I was walking in the Christ Church gardens and was stopped
by an
elderly woman sitting on a bench before a huge expanse of green
meadow,
full of thrushing long grass and honey-colored bulls...
She asked me where I was from. She
said that
she could tell I was an American from the way I carried myself
as I
walked.
Her name is Zoe Petersen. She sits before the swaying grass from
dawn to late afternoon, writing poems about the simplicity of
accepting nature. I sat on a damp bench with her for an hour,
reading the poems she says she intuitively felt she must write.
She never studied poetry, she said. She grew up in Switzerland
and has been in Oxford for the past thirty years.
She draws individual blades of grass in the
meadow, listening to their collective thrush. I told her of how
ill modern philosophy makes me at Oxford. She agreed that most
people don't see themselves reflected in nature.
****MOM I don't feel inspired at all here and I
just feel trite and stupid!!!!*****
I cried as I read about the skeleton woman,
sitting in the Trinity lab this morning. It reminds me of the
Estes' depiction of the woman whose father allowed her hands to
be cut off by the devil. I have founded a goddess cult here with
my Oxford friends. There is this tremendous need amongst young
adults to give voice to experiential pain and the treatment of
those introspective and female. My young friends here have such
a desire to use words to allude to spirit and love and synthesis
with the energy surrounding them. They so adore the words
goddess and divine and ecstatic. They are just aching to be part
of a mystery cult. And I think we've created one. These friends
have been the skeleton woman-both in a general sense and as
individuals. They are aching to connect in terms of shared pain.
Yesterday I walked up to them and said that we
should change the meaning of the word companion to 'those who
break chocolate together'. *I don't know where this is
god-damned going Mom!* There is an incredible interest in the
Sophia cult amongst young people. It has originated in a
third-wave feminism and popular female music artists sharing
their pain on a mass-scale. These mass-culture developments
provided an education, a starting-point for liberation from mass
values that they never were exposed to growing up. My friends
here don't have mothers who tell them that 'Truth is beauty, and
beauty is truth.' They have mothers that tell them: 'You
shouldn't wear your glasses, you need to look more fun.'
If I shared the essence of my mother's
confidence in nature with these gorgeous little friends, I
consider my life given tremendous value. My mother handed me
back my hands every time she told me she couldn't understand why
someone was cruel to me, every time she told me that I was
magnificent because I was me. She was the one to tell me that I
was beautiful in every way.
What use are any of us to each other if we can
not delight in our collective and individual beauty? There are
young people that want the Sophia cult, there are young
people-lots of them-who have never been told they were beautiful
in every way. There are so many facing a laughing devil, crying
on bloody stumps of arms. Thank you for your most gorgeously
integrative work. Baudelaire once wrote that good poetry has a
power of sorcery and your poem conjured up a spirit of agony and
beauty. Thank you for that gorgeous experience of life force.
yours,
e
(I have all her letters from this time. They
should be a book. This is the child who looked out a window one
night when she wasn't even 5 and told me 'there are stars in the
sky so far away that you can only see them in your mind.')
from deb Greeks
Have been thinking lately that The Word is Maya. That this
is also--has ever been--the fx of Eros.
What I love about the Greeks is the way they make it all move --
quicken: the soft feet, the long strides, the Helen of the soft
cheeks, the rage of Achilles, the Aphrodite of the long eyelashes
and beautiful rear-end. And the wretched things of shame, mere
bellies! LO. Take us there!
Of course that's all very romantic, the "Greek" composite...
REVERENCE
BILL MOYERS: How do you define
reverence?
PAUL WOODRUFF: I think reverence is the
capacity for awe in the face of the transcendent.
BILL MOYERS: The transcendent
being—
PAUL WOODRUFF: It's whatever we human
beings did not create: God, justice, the truth...
BILL MOYERS: Beauty.
PAUL WOODRUFF: Nature, beauty.
BILL MOYERS: Death?
PAUL WOODRUFF: Death is one of the most
awe-inspiring facts of our lives. And I think complementary to the
awe in the transcendent is a felt sense of our own mortality and our
own limitations, our own tendency to make mistakes.
BILL MOYERS: How does this create
reverence?
PAUL WOODRUFF: Realizing the— the
distance between us and the ideals which we see as transcendent is
the essence of reverence. Recognizing that, you know, we are— we are
born to die and between the time we're born and the time we die,
we'll— we'll probably make a number of significant mistakes, and
realizing that this is true of other people as well as of ourselves,
that we have a common— a common humanity and are all in the same way
vulnerable. It's the virtue in— actually, in both the Greek and the
Chinese system, I think, that protects the people who are most
helpless from the people who are most powerful. When a victorious
soldier kills a prisoner, that's a failure of reverence. When a
ruler refuses to hear a suppliant, that's a failure of
reverence.
When you're utterly helpless, if you're
an old person in a hospital, if you're a lonely minority teenager
stopped on a road late at night by a policeman, you really have
nothing between you and— and a terrible fate but the— what I would
call the reverence of the powerful person in your life at that
moment. The best clue to how reverent we are is how we treat the
weakest people around us.
please read the rest : Reverence
From: mike dickman
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Negative-Capability] Emailing: essene
>>deb wrote:
funny how all the other gods get their old haunts blown up, innit?>>
*i think ALL
gods get their haunts blown up or out of recognition sooner or
later...
ANYthing that
remains within the purview of samsara is subject to coming INTO
existence, and therefore to aging, changing, running out of energy
and disappearing back out of it - that's how being works (which
also, incidentally, gives the lie to Enoch and - hence - the rest
of it)... It's not a question of evil 'coming into' the world, but
that as long as we read the ons and offs as good and bad rather
than simply as open and shut, we are hoist with our own petard...
On/off is inherent in the world, the 'ten thousand things',
because on/off IS the yang and the yin, the weave (which what 'tantra'
means) of which the universe is woven...
Some things wink
in and out of existence in (what seems to us) a mere eyeblink (but
may well be subjective aeons as far as they're concerned). Others
seem to us to take forever (but may well be an eyeblink to
something else)... Look upon my works ye mighty and despair!...
All of which is
running round in circles - samsara. Then there is the vastness of
ultimate time/space, where none of this is of the least moment at
all... It comes and goes like the mental static in our own brains,
like the ebb and flow of winds and tides, and is part and parcel
but of no ultimate significance...
From there
something can be done to help. Otherwise we are like two non-swimmmers
drowning each other in our hopeless desire that we can help the
other be saved. We just pull each other down.
*** from deb:
Thank you for
this.
Well. I don't
question its purpose, its why. It just is. The field of opposites
and the flow of energy, the "gradients" you describe: seems to my
lack of thinking that the flow is what it's for, if for has
any meaning. Beyond this, as Jung said, it's all a new type of
peripatetics. I guess that's the dance.
And so we walk
in the circles. Is it to get out of them? Is it about us, the
wheel, some ultimate thingy, as in undoing some mistake, some dark
seed that fell into matter, Sophia's son, Sauron's model, who
thinks he's the only god? That's so egocentric. I think we just
walk is all. Because (and the because is simply the human making
meaning: it's what we do. Instinct.)
Because:
THIS:
*Our individual moments of compassion --
*that one moment when Sisyphus's boulder is still, just before it
changes direction --
*that sympathy and seeing self in other that ultimately jacks up
and allows the frenzy that lets the Ring take itself down Mt.
Doom:
THAT is our own,
our heart, our breath.
In The Red Book,
Jung's "guide for much of the time was the only-half imagined
Philemon, the wise old man whose influence convinced Jung there
are things in the psyche which I do not produce, but which produce
themselves and have their own life."
"That which is
creative creates itself." John Keats
x's
deb
*****
mike writes
Well. I don't question its
purpose, its why. It just is.
Actually, what's important is that it has two ways
of 'is-ing'...
One just sweeps you away and gets you caught up in
the flicker of on-offs, your thoughts solidifying even as you
think them, and then spawining new ones, as infinitum - all of
them solid and turgid and impossible to work with.
The other is to realise the fountain of becoming -
the richness of the display and its inherent emptiness as a single
gesture - and not to get *caught up* in the creation of the saga,
but (as Lao-tzu says) to simply remain with source, or (as the
Buddhists say) not to lose sight of the fact that wave is inherent
in the ocean, the cloud innate to the nature of the sky... You
don't have to dissolve the clouds or stop the waves; just
understand them for what they are.
Then, instead of being dragged round in circles,
you walk of your own free will, and - because you can now walk
with both hands free - you can chopwood, draw water and hire
foolish wise men to bring snow so you can fill the wells with
them. It's for *them* you walk, *not* because you're constrained
by your own bewilderment to do so.
The
field of opposites and the flow of energy, the "gradients" you
describe: seems to my lack of thinking that the flow is what it's
for, if for has any meaning.
*Meaning it certainly has - it is the endless
source and display of great bliss - the very body, speech and mind
of the innermost teacher... If you become attached to perceptions
and emotions, turning them into something that they are not, the
fountain dries up, the images freeze, the 'radiance' dims - dulls!
- and you are left with a world that is actually only your own
perception, no matter how real it seems. I'll give you an example:
This morning I dreamt that Vera had finally had enough of me and
wanted me out... This is the dream as I noted it in my 'diary'...
"... I wake to hear Vera still downstairs.
The kids are somewhere upstairs with me, shocked
into utter silence.
I make my way down. She's in the bare front room
next to the long, dead stairway that leads almost directly to the
front door.
I tell her I'll accept her divorce terms and
leave.
She regards me with utter contempt as I try to get
one tiniest spark of recognition from her, but everything I do is
just another sign of my uselessness.
Finally, as I go back up to get my stuff and
realise I'll be leaving the country too (what reason is there,
now, to stay there?) I ask for the phone numbers of two friends
which she says she'll leave for me.
I know my salary for this will cover my immediate
needs, but now realise that I'll probably never see the kids
again, either, and, as I walk back into my room to pack, burst
into heart–broken tears
..."
Blah, blah blah!...
At this point, I awoke, and she was just coming
into the room to get dressed. I told her the dream and she took me
in her arms and held me very tight and said "I love you, you
nutter. I'm not about to divorce you!" So it's just a dream you
might say, or interesting dream, or what is that dream trying to
tell you? but what it IS telling me is that I'm projecting
insecurities (and securities) (and every other possible mental
'movie') I hardly even know I have on everything, all the time,
and that what I see of anything I actually do see is generally
long gone by the time I've waded through all my references
surrounding it. The dream 'reality' (because it IS reality when
I'm dreaming it) makes me feel 'heart-broken', 'scared', 'bad';
the waking 'reality' (because it IS reality when I'm awake in it)
makes me feel 'better', 'safer' and evn 'good', but what is there
actually between them?
They're both experienced by me as me and my world
and the only thing I can say with absolute certainty about either
of them is that I experienced them. I cannot lay claim to the
veridicality of either experience - I simply had them.
Suzanne sent that letter the other day with the
Goethe quote...
"I have come to the frightening conclusion that I
am the decisive element.
It is my personal approach that creates the climate.
It is my daily mood that makes the weather.
I possess tremendous power to make life miserable or joyous.
I can be a tool of torture or an instrument of inspiration.
I can humiliate or humor, hurt or heal.
In all situations, it is my response that decides whether a crisis
is escalated or de-escalated, and a
person is humanized or de-humanized.
If we treat people as they are, we make them worse.
If we treat people as they ought to be, we help them become what
they are
capable of becoming."
This is the whole point... Whether experience is
veridical or not is neither here nor there. What is important is
what you DO with it, and - even more particularly - why.
Beyond this, as Jung said, it's all circular. A new type of
peripatetic, he said. I guess that's the dance.
*Have you ever read the gnostic Hymn of Jesus?
And so we walk in the
circles. Is it to get out of them? Is it about us, the wheel, some
ultimate thingy, as in undoing some mistake, some dark seed that
fell into matter, Sophia's son, Sauron's model, who thinks he's
the only god?
* I often quote the poem by Hakuin concerning
Tokuun hiring foolish wise men to bring snow and then filling
wells with them, don't I? What is this ultimately about? He 'comes
down from his seat of marvellous attainment' and does something
utterly dimwitted - Why?
Because the foolish wise men think it's wise is
why, and because he knows that the only way to get beyond their
foolish wisdom is to go along with them, to join with them, to be
one with them in their stupidity and their lostness... That any
attempt to intervene from "without" is doomed from the very
outset; that you have to be one with them if your wisdom is the
real wisdom that manifests only as loving kindness and compassion.
Walking round in circles, or being dragged round
them by the nose, serves no purpose whatsoever except as a pointer
that something is not as it should be.
We tend, whenever things go wrong (or even go
right), to look into something outside ourselves as the cause
...and as the effect... So-and-so did such-and-such and now *I* am
experiencing such-and-such a result which I either like or don't
like... I am the victim of this, that and the next thing... One of
the major "satoris" (if I may grace it with so elevated a name) in
my brief life was suddenly actually hearing a verse of Dylan's
song 'I Shall be Released' and understanding what it meant.
now yonder stands a man
in this lonely crowd
a man who swears he's not to blame
all day long i hear him shouting so loud
crying out 'i was framed'
"That's RIGHT!" I shouted at myself. "That's WRONG!" - and I knew
I had been doing that ever since I could remember. Been trying to
stop ever since .-_-.
Because:
THIS:
*Our individual moments of compassion --
*that one moment when Sisyphus's boulder is still, just before it
changes direction --
*that sympathy and seeing self in other that ultimately jacks up
and allows the frenzy that lets the Ring take itself down Mt.
Doom:
THAT
is our own, our heart, our breath.
*Yes. Nothing to do with ends-in-view...
Just do what you can (I had an amazing realisation
the other day that Vera is one of the VERY few people I know who
actually DOES *DO* what she can, rather than expostulate about it
or cringe before it - explains why I love her so)
In The Red Book, Jung's "guide for much of the time was the
only-half imagined Philemon, the wise old man whose influence
convinced Jung there are things in the psyche which I do not
produce, but which produce themselves and have their own life."
*Hmmm.
I hae ma VERRRRY strrrenuous doots!... But if this meant in the
same vein as the Keats quote, you mention ( "That which is
creative creates itself."), then yes... Hand-knitted... The point
being how you choose - what you choose for - your wool!
Happy Mother's Day

What Mothers know:
Dark times ahead? Phooey, you guys. It’s the
mindset that’s the limiting factor. Simple
lack of imagination.
Bear with me a minute. Please.
It’s the heart that gets us places. The will
to go on. It got us here. It’s the only
thing that ever HAS gotten us here.
Somewhere, someone in terrible pain and
sorrow didn’t throw in the towel. The mother
on the wagon train buried her dead child and
(somehow!) got back in the wagon to carry on
and take care of the others. We’re obligated
to do the same, if only in her memory.
One of the first goals of propaganda is
having the opposition lose heart. Hence
Rush, O'Reilly, Hannity, and the other
little weasel clones. Please, just see them
for what they are. Laugh at them. Enough of
you have already turned off the tube. Now
quit buying their stuff. And if any of your
companies have any money left, or any of you
have anything in a 401K, pull it out of
whatever stocks it's in and take it to
Working Assets or Pax or the like and make
sure as best you can that you’re only
empowering good things. We may not have
much, but there’s an awful, awful lot of us.
Much scarier than CO2 damage is messing with
genetics re crops. Nature can heal herself
if you don’t mix up her innards. Let her
decide when to mutate. Because we don’t
control this. We don’t. And maybe consider
this: maybe slowing down some of the biotech
changes, misguided as the Holy Chosen Ones
are, might make for some happy accident,
some avoidance of some unexpected horror.
We don’t know how it works, really. So
relax. You don’t have to bloom the roses or
think for your liver.
Yes—by the gods, nukes are bad news. But it
was the simple gift of Prometheus, fire,
that lit the very air of Dresden. Machetes
do very well to kill people in Africa, and
nothing has ever compared to smallpox,
bubonic plague, or simple diarrhea in
efficacy.
People. There IS enough food to go around.
It just doesn’t go around.
THAT we can change.
I keep hearing this thing about humans
having lost their right to the planet, that
we’re a cancer and it’s only right that we
get snuffed. But isn't that playing into a
variant of the crazy Armageddon mindset
that’s leading Bush, Bolton, Perle, Falwell
and all the other arrogant fish folk over
the edge? We aren’t a cancer, except when
we’re greedy, and that’s an impulse we can
check. We have checked it in the
past, ELSE WE WOULDN’T BE HERE.
We aren’t some infestation on the holy
mother planet: we’re OF her, her very eyes
and ears and heart. Let’s be that. Deserve
that. Deserve our children, that’s what we
need to do.
Now you get back up on that wagon train. We
have to get over the next mountain, and
there's a storm coming.
Anyone bring a harmonica?
What is the use of a religion without a mythos, since religion
means, if anything, precisely that function which links us back
to eternal myth? ~CGJUNG
~ENTER~
|
Even if the whole
world were to fall to pieces, the unity of the psyche would
never be shattered. And the wider and more numerous the
fissures on the surface, the more the unity is strengthened in
the depths. CGJung, CW 10, Civilization In Transition
:310 |
HOME
|